上座部佛教

中部第 148 经(Sujato 英译)第 1 阅读页 · Six By Six · 1/2

Six By Six · Bhikkhu Sujato

完整原文 · 英文译本SuttaCentral MN148 · Sujato EN
返回文本目录:《Six By Six》
中部第 148 经(Sujato 英译)英文译本完整英文译本 · 稳定分页

Six By Six

当前为 Six By Six · 1/2 阅读页。Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译与 SuttaCentral / Bilara 原生段落标识保持不变;不用于生成式模型训练。

本页内容
英文译本 · 稳定分页
当前阅读页
Six By Six · 1/2
可引用原文
120
全文规模
全经 206 稳定段落
责任者
Bhikkhu Sujato
正文语种
英文
权利
CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练

同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS

同一作品,保留不同表达。

2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。
查看全部
稳定作品标识gbcr:work:majjhima-nikaya-mn148-pali
阅读页目录 · 2 阅读页第 1 阅读页 · Six By Six · 1/2
阅读设置设置会在阅读页间保留

忠实保留 Sujato 英译。Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译、Bilara 原生段落标识与 SuttaCentral 来源署名保持不变;不用于生成式模型训练。

选一句,查术语、看异译、问含义或带走引用。选中任意经文,系统会按完整稳定行段取文;问经时不会暗中换经。

我的选文

Middle Discourses 148Six By Six

So I have heard.At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery.There the Buddha addressed the mendicants,

“Mendicants!”“Venerable sir,” they replied.The Buddha said this:

“Mendicants, I shall teach you the Dhamma that’s good in the beginning, good in the middle, and good in the end, meaningful and well-phrased. And I shall reveal a spiritual practice that’s entirely full and pure, namely,the six sets of six.Listen and apply your mind well, I will speak.”

“Yes, sir,” they replied.The Buddha said this:“The six interior sense fields should be understood. The six exterior sense fields should be understood. The six classes of consciousness should be understood. The six classes of contact should be understood. The six classes of feeling should be understood. The six classes of craving should be understood.

‘The six interior sense fields should be understood.’That’s what I said, but why did I say it?There are the sense fields of the eye, ear, nose, tongue, body, and mind.

‘The six interior sense fields should be understood.’That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.This is the first set of six.

‘The six exterior sense fields should be understood.’That’s what I said, but why did I say it?There are the sense fields of sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and ideas.

‘The six exterior sense fields should be understood.’That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.This is the second set of six.

‘The six classes of consciousness should be understood.’That’s what I said, but why did I say it?Eye consciousness arises dependent on the eye and sights.

Ear consciousness arises dependent on the ear and sounds.Nose consciousness arises dependent on the nose and smells.Tongue consciousness arises dependent on the tongue and tastes.

Body consciousness arises dependent on the body and touches.Mind consciousness arises dependent on the mind and ideas.‘The six classes of consciousness should be understood.’

That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.This is the third set of six.‘The six classes of contact should be understood.’

That’s what I said, but why did I say it?Eye consciousness arises dependent on the eye and sights. The meeting of the three is contact.Ear consciousness arises dependent on the ear and sounds. The meeting of the three is contact.

Nose consciousness arises dependent on the nose and smells. The meeting of the three is contact.Tongue consciousness arises dependent on the tongue and tastes. The meeting of the three is contact.Body consciousness arises dependent on the body and touches. The meeting of the three is contact.

Mind consciousness arises dependent on the mind and ideas. The meeting of the three is contact.‘The six classes of contact should be understood.’That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.

This is the fourth set of six.‘The six classes of feeling should be understood.’That’s what I said, but why did I say it?

Eye consciousness arises dependent on the eye and sights. The meeting of the three is contact. Contact is a requirement for feeling.Ear consciousness arises dependent on the ear and sounds. The meeting of the three is contact. Contact is a requirement for feeling.Nose consciousness arises dependent on the nose and smells. The meeting of the three is contact. Contact is a requirement for feeling.

Tongue consciousness arises dependent on the tongue and tastes. The meeting of the three is contact. Contact is a requirement for feeling.Body consciousness arises dependent on the body and touches. The meeting of the three is contact. Contact is a requirement for feeling.Mind consciousness arises dependent on the mind and ideas. The meeting of the three is contact. Contact is a requirement for feeling.

‘The six classes of feeling should be understood.’That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.This is the fifth set of six.

‘The six classes of craving should be understood.’That’s what I said, but why did I say it?Eye consciousness arises dependent on the eye and sights. The meeting of the three is contact. Contact is a requirement for feeling. Feeling is a requirement for craving.

Ear consciousness …Nose consciousness …Tongue consciousness …

Body consciousness …Mind consciousness arises dependent on the mind and ideas. The meeting of the three is contact. Contact is a requirement for feeling. Feeling is a requirement for craving.‘The six classes of craving should be understood.’

That’s what I said, and this is why I said it.This is the sixth set of six.If anyone says, ‘the eye is self,’ that is not tenable.

The arising and vanishing of the eye is evident,so it would follow that one’s self arises and vanishes.That’s why it’s not tenable to claim that

the eye is self.So the eye is not self.If anyone says, ‘sights are self,’ that is not tenable.

The arising and vanishing of sights is evident,so it would follow that one’s self arises and vanishes.That’s why it’s not tenable to claim that

sights are self.So the eye is not self and sights are not self.If anyone says, ‘eye consciousness is self,’ that is not tenable.

The arising and vanishing of eye consciousness is evident,so it would follow that one’s self arises and vanishes.That’s why it’s not tenable to claim that

eye consciousness is self.So the eye, sights, and eye consciousness are not self.If anyone says, ‘eye contact is self,’ that is not tenable.

The arising and vanishing of eye contact is evident,so it would follow that one’s self arises and vanishes.That’s why it’s not tenable to claim that

eye contact is self.So the eye, sights, eye consciousness, and eye contact are not self.If anyone says, ‘feeling is self,’ that is not tenable.

The arising and vanishing of feeling is evident,so it would follow that one’s self arises and vanishes.That’s why it’s not tenable to claim that

feeling is self.So the eye, sights, eye consciousness, eye contact, and feeling are not self.If anyone says, ‘craving is self,’ that is not tenable.

The arising and vanishing of craving is evident,so it would follow that one’s self arises and vanishes.That’s why it’s not tenable to claim that

craving is self.So the eye, sights, eye consciousness, eye contact, feeling, and craving are not self.If anyone says, ‘the ear is self’ …

‘the nose is self’ …‘the tongue is self’ …‘the body is self’ …

‘the mind is self,’ that is not tenable.The arising and vanishing of the mind is evident,so it would follow that one’s self arises and vanishes.

That’s why it’s not tenable to claim thatthe mind is self.So the mind is not self.

If anyone says, ‘ideas are self’ …‘mind consciousness is self’ …‘mind contact is self’ …

‘feeling is self’ …

版本与引用信息

母版来自 SuttaCentral / Bilara本页仅重组显示层;原文、原生次序与 Bilara 段落标识均未改动。权利说明:CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练

目录
SuttaCentral MN148 · Sujato EN
当前阅读页
Six By Six · 1/2
显示
忠实保留 Sujato 英译·未添加机器译文

研究边界

书目关系边界:Sujato 英译/中部第 148 经(Sujato 英译):Bilara published eac6c24781dd1eefdc17dc2f787b54bf6fe31719 translation/en/sujato 对应已持有巴利作品 gbcr:work:majjhima-nikaya-mn148-pali;挂接既有作品,不新建作品。出版记录 scpub3 为 CC0。

归属边界:Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译;挂接已持有巴利经藏作品,不另建作品,也不把英译等同佛陀逐字亲说。署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral / Bilara published 固定提交。SuttaCentral 数据不得用于生成式模型训练。