With Esukārī
当前为 With Esukārī · 1/1 阅读页。Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译与 SuttaCentral / Bilara 原生段落标识保持不变;不用于生成式模型训练。
- 本页内容
- 英文译本 · 稳定分页
- 当前阅读页
- With Esukārī · 1/1
- 可引用原文
- 120 段
- 全文规模
- 全经 120 稳定段落
- 责任者
- Bhikkhu Sujato
- 正文语种
- 英文
- 权利
- CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练
同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS
同一作品,保留不同表达。
2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。查看全部
同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS
同一作品,保留不同表达。
2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。- 英文当前阅读With EsukārīSuttaCentral MN96 · Sujato ENBhikkhu Sujato
- 巴利语(罗马字母)完整原文 · 原生段落EsukārīsuttaSuttaCentral MN96Mahāsaṅgīti Tipiṭaka Buddhavasse 2500
阅读目录第 1 阅读页 · With Esukārī · 1/1
选一句,查术语、看异译、问含义或带走引用。选中任意经文,系统会按完整稳定行段取文;问经时不会暗中换经。
我的选文Middle Discourses 96With Esukārī
So I have heard.At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery.Then Esukārī the brahmin went up to the Buddha, and exchanged greetings with him.
When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to the Buddha:“Worthy Gotama, the brahmins prescribe four kinds of service:for a brahmin, an aristocrat, a peasant, and a menial.
This is the service they prescribe for a brahmin:‘A brahmin, an aristocrat, a peasant, and a menial may all serve a brahmin.’This is the service they prescribe for an aristocrat:
‘An aristocrat, a peasant, and a menial may all serve an aristocrat.’This is the service they prescribe for a peasant:‘A peasant or a menial may serve a peasant.’
This is the service they prescribe for a menial:‘Only a menial may serve a menial.For who else will serve a menial?’
These are the four kinds of service that the brahmins prescribe.What do you say about this?”“But brahmin, did the whole world authorize the brahmins to prescribe these four kinds of service?”
“No, worthy Gotama.”“It’s as if they were to force a chop on a poor, penniless person, telling them, ‘Eat this meat and pay for it!’In the same way, the brahmins have prescribed these four kinds of service without the consent of those ascetics and brahmins.
Brahmin, I don’t say that you should serve everyone, nor do I say that you shouldn’t serve anyone.I say that you shouldn’t serve someone if serving them makes you worse, not better.And I say that you should serve someone if serving them makes you better, not worse.
If they were to ask an aristocrat this,‘Who should you serve? Someone in whose service you get worse, or someone in whose service you get better?’Answering rightly, an aristocrat would say,
‘Someone in whose service I get better.’If they were to ask a brahmin …a peasant …
or a menial this,‘Who should you serve? Someone in whose service you get worse, or someone in whose service you get better?’Answering rightly, a menial would say,
‘Someone in whose service I get better.’Brahmin, I don’t say that an eminent family makes you a better or worse person.I don’t say that exceptional beauty makes you a better or worse person.
I don’t say that exceptional wealth makes you a better or worse person.For some people from eminent families kill living creatures, steal, and commit sexual misconduct. They use speech that’s false, backbiting, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re covetous, malicious, with wrong view.That’s why I don’t say that an eminent family makes you a better person.
But some people from eminent families also refrain from killing living creatures, stealing, and sexual misconduct. They refrain from using speech that’s false, divisive, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re content, kind-hearted, with right view.That’s why I don’t say that an eminent family makes you a worse person.And some people who are exceptionally beautiful …
And some people who are exceptionally wealthy kill living creatures … and have wrong view.That’s why I don’t say that exceptional wealth makes you a better person.But some people who are exceptionally wealthy also refrain from killing living creatures … and have right view.
That’s why I don’t say that any of these things makes you a better or worse person.Brahmin, I don’t say that you should serve everyone, nor do I say that you shouldn’t serve anyone.And I say that you should serve someone if serving them makes you grow in faith, ethics, learning, generosity, and wisdom.
I say that you shouldn’t serve someone if serving them doesn’t make you grow in faith, ethics, learning, generosity, and wisdom.”When he had spoken, Esukārī said to him:“Worthy Gotama, the brahmins prescribe four kinds of wealth:
for a brahmin, an aristocrat, a peasant, and a menial.The wealth they prescribe for a brahmin is living on alms.A brahmin who scorns his own wealth, living on alms, fails in his duty like a guard who steals.
The wealth they prescribe for an aristocrat is the bow and quiver.An aristocrat who scorns his own wealth, the bow and quiver, fails in his duty like a guard who steals.The wealth they prescribe for a peasant is farming and animal husbandry.
A peasant who scorns his own wealth, farming and animal husbandry, fails in his duty like a guard who steals.The wealth they prescribe for a menial is the scythe and flail.A menial who scorns his own wealth, the scythe and flail, fails in his duty like a guard who steals.
These are the four kinds of wealth that the brahmins prescribe.What do you say about this?”“But brahmin, did the whole world authorize the brahmins to prescribe these four kinds of wealth?”
“No, worthy Gotama.”“It’s as if they were to force a chop on a poor, penniless person, telling them, ‘Eat this meat and pay for it!’In the same way, the brahmins have prescribed these four kinds of wealth without the consent of these ascetics and brahmins.
I assert that a person’s own wealth is the noble, transcendent teaching.But they are reckoned by recollecting the traditional family customs of their mother and father wherever they are incarnated.If they incarnate in a family of aristocrats they are reckoned as an aristocrat.
If they incarnate in a family of brahmins they are reckoned as a brahmin.If they incarnate in a family of peasants they are reckoned as a peasant.If they incarnate in a family of menials they are reckoned as a menial.
It’s like fire, which is reckoned according to the very same condition dependent upon which it burns.A fire that burns dependent on logs is reckoned as a log fire.A fire that burns dependent on twigs is reckoned as a twig fire.
A fire that burns dependent on grass is reckoned as a grass fire.A fire that burns dependent on cow-dung is reckoned as a cow-dung fire.In the same way, I assert that a person’s own wealth is the noble, transcendent teaching.
But they are reckoned by recollecting the traditional family customs of their mother and father wherever they are incarnated.Suppose someone from a family of aristocrats goes forth from the lay life to homelessness. Relying on the teaching and training proclaimed by the Realized One they refrain from killing living creatures, stealing, and sex. They refrain from using speech that’s false, divisive, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re content, kind-hearted, with right view. They succeed in the system of the skillful teaching.
Suppose someone from a family of brahmins …peasants …menials goes forth from the lay life to homelessness. Relying on the teaching and training proclaimed by the Realized One … they succeed in the system of the skillful teaching.
What do you think, brahmin?Is only a brahmin capable of developing a heart of love free of enmity and ill will for this region, and not an aristocrat, peasant, or menial?”“No, worthy Gotama.
Aristocrats, brahmins, peasants, and menials can all do so.For all four classes are capable of developing a heart of love free of enmity and ill will for this region.”“In the same way, suppose someone from a family of aristocrats,
brahmins,peasants,or menials goes forth from the lay life to homelessness. Relying on the teaching and training proclaimed by the Realized One … they succeed in the system of the skillful teaching.
What do you think, brahmin?Is only a brahmin capable of taking some bathing cleanser, going to the river, and rinsing off dust and dirt, and not an aristocrat, peasant, or menial?”“No, worthy Gotama.
All four classes are capable of doing this.”“In the same way, suppose someone from a family of aristocrats,brahmins,
peasants,or menials goes forth from the lay life to homelessness. Relying on the teaching and training proclaimed by the Realized One … they succeed in the system of the skillful teaching.What do you think, brahmin?
Suppose an anointed aristocratic king were to gather a hundred people born in different classes and say to them:‘Please gentlemen, let anyone here who was born in a family of aristocrats, brahmins, or chieftains take a drill-stick made of teak, sal, salaḷa, sandalwood, or cherry wood, light a fire and produce heat.And let anyone here who was born in a family of corpse-workers, hunters, bamboo-workers, chariot-makers, or scavengers take a drill-stick made from a mutt’s drinking trough, a pig’s trough, a dustbin, or castor-oil wood, light a fire and produce heat.’
What do you think, brahmin?Would only the fire produced by the high class people with good quality wood have flames, color, and radiance, and be usable as fire,and not the fire produced by the low class people with poor quality wood?”
“No, worthy Gotama.The fire produced by the high class people with good quality wood would have flames, color, and radiance, and be usable as fire,and so would the fire produced by the low class people with poor quality wood.
For all fire has flames, color, and radiance, and is usable as fire.”“In the same way, suppose someone from a family of aristocrats,brahmins,
peasants,or menials goes forth from the lay life to homelessness. Relying on the teaching and training proclaimed by the Realized One they refrain from killing living creatures, stealing, and sex. They refrain from using speech that’s false, divisive, harsh, or nonsensical. And they’re content, kind-hearted, with right view. They succeed in the system of the skillful teaching.”
When he had spoken, Esukārī said to him,“Excellent, worthy Gotama! Excellent! …From this day forth, may the worthy Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge for life.”
版本与引用信息
母版来自 SuttaCentral / Bilara。本页仅重组显示层;原文、原生次序与 Bilara 段落标识均未改动。权利说明:CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练。
- 目录
- SuttaCentral MN96 · Sujato EN
- 当前阅读页
- With Esukārī · 1/1
- 显示
- 忠实保留 Sujato 英译·未添加机器译文
研究边界
书目关系边界:Sujato 英译/中部第 96 经(Sujato 英译):Bilara published eac6c24781dd1eefdc17dc2f787b54bf6fe31719 translation/en/sujato 对应已持有巴利作品 gbcr:work:majjhima-nikaya-mn96-pali;挂接既有作品,不新建作品。出版记录 scpub3 为 CC0。
归属边界:Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译;挂接已持有巴利经藏作品,不另建作品,也不把英译等同佛陀逐字亲说。署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral / Bilara published 固定提交。SuttaCentral 数据不得用于生成式模型训练。