上座部佛教

中部第 63 经(Sujato 英译)第 1 阅读页 · The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkyaputta · 1/1

The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkyaputta · Bhikkhu Sujato

完整原文 · 英文译本SuttaCentral MN63 · Sujato EN
返回文本目录:《The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkyaputta》
中部第 63 经(Sujato 英译)英文译本完整英文译本 · 稳定分页

The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkyaputta

当前为 The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkyaputta · 1/1 阅读页。Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译与 SuttaCentral / Bilara 原生段落标识保持不变;不用于生成式模型训练。

本页内容
英文译本 · 稳定分页
当前阅读页
The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkyaputta · 1/1
可引用原文
112
全文规模
全经 112 稳定段落
责任者
Bhikkhu Sujato
正文语种
英文
权利
CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练

同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS

同一作品,保留不同表达。

2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。
查看全部
稳定作品标识gbcr:work:majjhima-nikaya-mn63-pali
阅读目录第 1 阅读页 · The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkyaputta · 1/1
阅读设置设置会在阅读页间保留

忠实保留 Sujato 英译。Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译、Bilara 原生段落标识与 SuttaCentral 来源署名保持不变;不用于生成式模型训练。

选一句,查术语、看异译、问含义或带走引用。选中任意经文,系统会按完整稳定行段取文;问经时不会暗中换经。

我的选文

Middle Discourses 63The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkyaputta

So I have heard.At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery.Then as Venerable Māluṅkyaputta was in private retreat this thought came to his mind:

“There are several convictions that the Buddha has left undeclared; he has set them aside and turned them down.For example: the cosmos is eternal, or not eternal, or finite, or infinite; the soul and the body are one and the same, or the soul is one thing, the body another; after death, a realized one still exists, or no longer exists, or both still exists and no longer exists, or neither still exists nor no longer exists.

The Buddha does not explain these points to me.I don’t endorse that, and do not accept it.I’ll go to him and ask him about this.

If he gives me a straight answer on any of these points,I will lead the spiritual life under him.If he does not explain these points to me,

I shall resign the training and return to a lesser life.”Then in the late afternoon, Māluṅkyaputta came out of retreat and went to the Buddha. He bowed, sat down to one side, and told the Buddha of his thoughts. He then continued:“If the Buddha knows

that the cosmos is eternal, please tell me.If you knowthat the cosmos is not eternal, tell me.

If you don’t knowwhether the cosmos is eternal or not, then it is straightforward to simply say:‘I neither know nor see.’

If you knowthat the cosmos is finite,or infinite;

that the soul and the body are one and the same,or is the soul one thing, the body another;that after death, a realized one still exists,

or no longer exists,or both still exists and no longer exists, or neither still exists nor no longer exists, please tell me.If you don’t know

any of these things, then it is straightforward to simply say:‘I neither know nor see.’”“What, Māluṅkyaputta, did I ever say to you:

‘Come, Māluṅkyaputta, lead the spiritual life under me, and I will declare these things to you’?”“No, sir.”“Or did you ever say to me:

‘Sir, I will lead the spiritual life under the Buddha, and the Buddha will declare these things to me’?”“No, sir.”“So it seems that I did not say to you:

‘Come, Māluṅkyaputta, lead the spiritual life under me, and I will declare these things to you.’And you never said to me:‘Sir, I will lead the spiritual life under the Buddha, and the Buddha will declare these things to me.’

In that case, you futile man, who are you and what do you disavow?Suppose someone were to say this:‘I will not lead the spiritual life under the Buddha until the Buddha declares to me

that the cosmos is eternal, or that the cosmos is not eternal …or that after death a realized one neither still exists nor no longer exists.’That would still remain undeclared by the Realized One, and meanwhile that individual would die.

Suppose a man was struck by an arrow thickly smeared with poison.His friends and colleagues, relatives and kin would get a surgeon to treat him.But the man would say:

‘I won’t extract this arrow as long as I don’t know whether the man who wounded me was an aristocrat, a brahmin, a peasant, or a menial.’He’d say:‘I won’t extract this arrow as long as I don’t know the following things about the man who wounded me: his name and clan;

whether he’s tall, short, or medium;whether his skin is black, brown, or dingy;and whether he comes from such-and-such village, town, or city.

I won’t extract this arrow as long as I don’t know whether the bow that wounded me was straight or recurved;whether the bow-string is made of swallow-wort fibre, sunn hemp fibre, sinew, sanseveria fibre, or spurge fibre;whether the shaft is made from a bush or a plantation tree;

whether the shaft was fitted with feathers from a vulture, a heron, a hawk, a peacock, or a stork;whether the shaft was bound with sinews of a cow, a buffalo, a black lion, or an ape;and whether the arrowhead was spiked, razor-tipped, barbed, made of iron or a calf’s tooth, or lancet-shaped.’

That man would still not have learned these things, and meanwhile they’d die.In the same way, suppose someone was to say:‘I will not lead the spiritual life under the Buddha until the Buddha declares to me

that the cosmos is eternal, or that the cosmos is not eternal …or that after death a realized one neither still exists nor no longer exists.’That would still remain undeclared by the Realized One, and meanwhile that individual would die.

It’s not true that if there were the view ‘the cosmos is eternal’ there would be the living of the spiritual life.It’s not true that if there were the view ‘the cosmos is not eternal’ there would be the living of the spiritual life.When there is the view that the cosmos is eternal or that the cosmos is not eternal, there is rebirth, there is old age, there is death, and there is sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress.

And it is the defeat of these things in this very life that I advocate.It’s not true that if there were the view ‘the cosmos is finite’ …‘the cosmos is infinite’ …

‘the soul and the body are one and the same’ …‘the soul is one thing, the body another’ …‘a realized one still exists after death’ …

‘a realized one no longer exists after death’ …‘a realized one both still exists and no longer exists after death’ …‘a realized one neither still exists nor no longer exists after death’ there would be the living of the spiritual life.

When there are any of these views there is rebirth, there is old age, there is death, and there is sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, and distress.And it is the defeat of these things in this very life that I advocate.So, Māluṅkyaputta, you should remember what I have not declared as undeclared,

and what I have declared as declared.And what have I not declared?I have not declared the following: ‘the cosmos is eternal,’

‘the cosmos is not eternal,’‘the cosmos is finite,’‘the world is infinite,’

‘the soul and the body are one and the same,’‘the soul is one thing, the body another,’‘a realized one still exists after death,’

‘a realized one no longer exists after death,’‘a realized one both still exists and no longer exists after death,’‘a realized one neither still exists nor no longer exists after death.’

And why haven’t I declared these things?Because they aren’t beneficial or relevant to the fundamentals of the spiritual life. They don’t lead to disillusionment, dispassion, cessation, peace, insight, awakening, and extinguishment.That’s why I haven’t declared them.

And what have I declared?I have declared the following: ‘this is suffering,’‘this is the origin of suffering,’

‘this is the cessation of suffering,’‘this is the practice that leads to the cessation of suffering.’And why have I declared these things?

Because they are beneficial and relevant to the fundamentals of the spiritual life. They lead to disillusionment, dispassion, cessation, peace, insight, awakening, and extinguishment.That’s why I have declared them.So, Māluṅkyaputta, you should remember what I have not declared as undeclared,

and what I have declared as declared.”That is what the Buddha said.Satisfied, Venerable Māluṅkyaputta approved what the Buddha said.

版本与引用信息

母版来自 SuttaCentral / Bilara本页仅重组显示层;原文、原生次序与 Bilara 段落标识均未改动。权利说明:CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练

目录
SuttaCentral MN63 · Sujato EN
当前阅读页
The Shorter Discourse With Māluṅkyaputta · 1/1
显示
忠实保留 Sujato 英译·未添加机器译文

研究边界

书目关系边界:Sujato 英译/中部第 63 经(Sujato 英译):Bilara published eac6c24781dd1eefdc17dc2f787b54bf6fe31719 translation/en/sujato 对应已持有巴利作品 gbcr:work:majjhima-nikaya-mn63-pali;挂接既有作品,不新建作品。出版记录 scpub3 为 CC0。

归属边界:Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译;挂接已持有巴利经藏作品,不另建作品,也不把英译等同佛陀逐字亲说。署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral / Bilara published 固定提交。SuttaCentral 数据不得用于生成式模型训练。