A Sure Bet
当前为 A Sure Bet · 1/3 阅读页。Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译与 SuttaCentral / Bilara 原生段落标识保持不变;不用于生成式模型训练。
- 本页内容
- 英文译本 · 稳定分页
- 当前阅读页
- A Sure Bet · 1/3
- 可引用原文
- 120 段
- 全文规模
- 全经 274 稳定段落
- 责任者
- Bhikkhu Sujato
- 正文语种
- 英文
- 权利
- CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练
同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS
同一作品,保留不同表达。
2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。查看全部
同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS
同一作品,保留不同表达。
2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。- 英文当前阅读A Sure BetSuttaCentral MN60 · Sujato ENBhikkhu Sujato
- 巴利语(罗马字母)完整原文 · 原生段落ApaṇṇakasuttaSuttaCentral MN60Mahāsaṅgīti Tipiṭaka Buddhavasse 2500
阅读页目录 · 3 阅读页第 1 阅读页 · A Sure Bet · 1/3
选一句,查术语、看异译、问含义或带走引用。选中任意经文,系统会按完整稳定行段取文;问经时不会暗中换经。
我的选文Middle Discourses 60A Sure Bet
So I have heard.At one time the Buddha was wandering in the land of the Kosalans together with a large Saṅgha of mendicants when he arrived at a village of the Kosalan brahmins named Sālā.The brahmins and householders of Sālā heard:
“It seems the ascetic Gotama—a Sakyan, gone forth from a Sakyan family—wandering in the land of the Kosalans has arrived at Sālā, together with a large Saṅgha of mendicants.He has this good reputation:‘That Blessed One is perfected, a fully awakened Buddha, accomplished in knowledge and conduct, holy, knower of the world, supreme guide for those fit for training, teacher of gods and humans, awakened, blessed.’
He has realized with his own insight this world—with its gods, Māras, and divinities, this population with its ascetics and brahmins, gods and humans—and he makes it known to others.He teaches Dhamma that’s good in the beginning, good in the middle, and good in the end, meaningful and well-phrased. And he reveals a spiritual practice that’s entirely full and pure.
It’s good to see such perfected ones.”Then the brahmins and householders of Sālā went up to the Buddha. Before sitting down to one side, some bowed, some exchanged greetings and polite conversation, some held up their cupped palms toward the Buddha, some announced their name and clan, while some kept silent. The Buddha said to them:“So, householders, is there any teacher you’re happy with, in whom you have acquired grounded faith?”
“No, sir.”“Since you haven’t found a teacher you’re happy with, you should undertake and implement this sure bet teaching.For when the sure bet teaching is undertaken, it will be for your lasting welfare and happiness.
And what is the sure bet teaching?There are some ascetics and brahmins who have this doctrine and view:‘There’s no meaning in giving, sacrifice, or offerings. There’s no fruit or result of good and bad deeds. There’s no afterlife. There’s no such thing as mother and father, or beings that are reborn spontaneously. And there’s no ascetic or brahmin who is rightly comported and rightly practiced, and who describes the afterlife after realizing it with their own insight.’
And there are some ascetics and brahmins whose doctrine directly contradicts this.They say:‘There is meaning in giving, sacrifice, and offerings. There are fruits and results of good and bad deeds. There is an afterlife. There are such things as mother and father, and beings that are reborn spontaneously. And there are ascetics and brahmins who are rightly comported and rightly practiced, and who describe the afterlife after realizing it with their own insight.’
What do you think, householders?Don’t these doctrines directly contradict each other?”“Yes, sir.”
“Since this is so, consider those ascetics and brahmins whose view is thatthere’s no meaning in giving, etc.You can expect that they will shun good conduct by way of body, speech, and mind, and undertake and implement bad conduct by way of body, speech, and mind.
Why is that?Because those ascetics and brahmins don’t see that unskillful qualities are full of drawbacks, sordidness, and corruption, or that skillful qualities have the benefit and cleansing power of renunciation.Moreover, since there actually is another world, their view that there is no other world is wrong view.
Since there actually is another world, their thought that there is no other world is wrong purpose.Since there actually is another world, their speech that there is no other world is wrong speech.Since there actually is another world, in saying that there is no other world they contradict those perfected ones who know the other world.
Since there actually is another world, in persuading another that there is no other world they are persuading them to accept an untrue teaching.And on account of that they glorify themselves and put others down.So they give up their former ethical conduct and are established in unethical conduct.
And that is how these many bad, unskillful qualities come to be with wrong view as condition—wrong view, wrong purpose, wrong speech, contradicting the noble ones, persuading others to accept untrue teachings, and glorifying oneself and putting others down.A sensible person reflects on this matter in this way:‘If there is no other world, when this individual person’s body breaks up they will keep themselves safe.
And if there is another world, when their body breaks up, after death, they will be reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell.But let us grant that those who say that there is no other world are correct.Regardless, that individual is still criticized by sensible people in this very life as being an immoral individual of wrong view, a nihilist.’
But if there really is another world, they hold a losing hand on both counts.For they are criticized by sensible people in this very life, and when their body breaks up, after death, they will be reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell.They have wrongly undertaken this sure bet teaching in such a way that it encompasses the positive outcomes of one side only, leaving out the skillful premise.
Since this is so, consider those ascetics and brahmins whose view is thatthere is meaning in giving, etc.You can expect that they will shun bad conduct by way of body, speech, and mind, and undertake and implement good conduct by way of body, speech, and mind.
Why is that?Because those ascetics and brahmins see that unskillful qualities are full of drawbacks, sordidness, and corruption, and that skillful qualities have the benefit and cleansing power of renunciation.Moreover, since there actually is another world, their view that there is another world is right view.
Since there actually is another world, their thought that there is another world is right purpose.Since there actually is another world, their speech that there is another world is right speech.Since there actually is another world, in saying that there is another world they don’t contradict those perfected ones who know the other world.
Since there actually is another world, in persuading another that there is another world they are persuading them to accept a true teaching.And on account of that they don’t glorify themselves or put others down.So they give up their former unethical conduct and are established in ethical conduct.
And that is how these many skillful qualities come to be with right view as condition—right view, right purpose, right speech, not contradicting the noble ones, persuading others to accept true teachings, and not glorifying oneself or putting others down.A sensible person reflects on this matter in this way:‘If there is another world, when this individual’s body breaks up, after death, they will be reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.
But let us grant that those who say that there is no other world are correct.Regardless, that individual is still praised by sensible people in this very life as being a moral individual of right view, who affirms a positive teaching.’So if there really is another world, they hold a winning hand on both counts.
For they are praised by sensible people in this very life, and when their body breaks up, after death, they will be reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.They have rightly undertaken this sure bet teaching in such a way that it encompasses the positive outcomes of both sides, leaving out the unskillful premise.There are some ascetics and brahmins who have this doctrine and view:
‘The one who acts does nothing wrong when they punish, mutilate, torture, aggrieve, oppress, intimidate, or when they encourage others to do the same. They do nothing wrong when they kill, steal, break into houses, plunder wealth, steal from isolated buildings, commit highway robbery, commit adultery, and lie.If you were to reduce all the living creatures of this earth to one heap and mass of flesh with a razor-edged chakram, no evil comes of that, and no outcome of evil.
If you were to go along the south bank of the Ganges killing, mutilating, and torturing, and encouraging others to do the same, no evil comes of that, and no outcome of evil.If you were to go along the north bank of the Ganges giving and sacrificing and encouraging others to do the same, no merit comes of that, and no outcome of merit.In giving, self-control, restraint, and truthfulness there is no merit or outcome of merit.’
And there are some ascetics and brahmins whose doctrine directly contradicts this. They say:‘The one who acts does a bad deed when they punish, mutilate, torture, aggrieve, oppress, intimidate, or when they encourage others to do the same. They do a bad deed when they kill, steal, break into houses, plunder wealth, steal from isolated buildings, commit highway robbery, commit adultery, and lie.
If you were to reduce all the living creatures of this earth to one heap and mass of flesh with a razor-edged chakram, evil comes of that, and an outcome of evil.If you were to go along the south bank of the Ganges killing, mutilating, and torturing, and encouraging others to do the same, evil comes of that, and an outcome of evil.If you were to go along the north bank of the Ganges giving and sacrificing and encouraging others to do the same, merit comes of that, and an outcome of merit.
In giving, self-control, restraint, and truthfulness there is merit and outcome of merit.’What do you think, householders?Don’t these doctrines directly contradict each other?”
“Yes, sir.”“Since this is so, consider those ascetics and brahmins whose view is thatthe one who acts does nothing wrong when they punish, etc.
You can expect that they will shun good conduct by way of body, speech, and mind, and undertake and implement bad conduct by way of body, speech, and mind.Why is that?Because those ascetics and brahmins don’t see that unskillful qualities are full of drawbacks, sordidness, and corruption, or that skillful qualities have the benefit and cleansing power of renunciation.
Moreover, since action actually does have an effect, their view that action is ineffective is wrong view.Since action actually does have an effect, their thought that action is ineffective is wrong purpose.Since action actually does have an effect, their speech that action is ineffective is wrong speech.
Since action actually does have an effect, in saying that action is ineffective they contradict those perfected ones who teach that action is effective.Since action actually does have an effect, in persuading another that action is ineffective they are persuading them to accept an untrue teaching.And on account of that they glorify themselves and put others down.
So they give up their former ethical conduct and are established in unethical conduct.And that is how these many bad, unskillful qualities come to be with wrong view as condition—wrong view, wrong purpose, wrong speech, contradicting the noble ones, persuading others to accept untrue teachings, and glorifying oneself and putting others down.A sensible person reflects on this matter in this way:
‘If there is no effective action, when this individual’s body breaks up they will keep themselves safe.And if there is effective action, when their body breaks up, after death, they will be reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell.But let us grant that those who say that there is no effective action are correct.
Regardless, that individual is still criticized by sensible people in this very life as being an immoral individual of wrong view, one who denies the efficacy of action.’But if there really is effective action, they hold a losing hand on both counts.For they are criticized by sensible people in this very life, and when their body breaks up, after death, they will be reborn in a place of loss, a bad place, the underworld, hell.
They have wrongly undertaken this sure bet teaching in such a way that it encompasses the positive outcomes of one side only, leaving out the skillful premise.Since this is so, consider those ascetics and brahmins whose view is thatthe one who acts does a bad deed when they punish, etc.
You can expect that they will shun bad conduct by way of body, speech, and mind, and undertake and implement good conduct by way of body, speech, and mind.Why is that?Because those ascetics and brahmins see that unskillful qualities are full of drawbacks, sordidness, and corruption, and that skillful qualities have the benefit and cleansing power of renunciation.
Moreover, since action actually does have an effect, their view that action is effective is right view.Since action actually does have an effect, their thought that action is effective is right purpose.Since action actually does have an effect, their speech that action is effective is right speech.
Since action actually does have an effect, in saying that action is effective they don’t contradict those perfected ones who teach that action is effective.Since action actually does have an effect, in persuading another that action is effective they are persuading them to accept a true teaching.And on account of that they don’t glorify themselves or put others down.
So they give up their former unethical conduct and are established in ethical conduct.And that is how these many skillful qualities come to be with right view as condition—right view, right purpose, right speech, not contradicting the noble ones, persuading others to accept true teachings, and not glorifying oneself or putting others down.A sensible person reflects on this matter in this way:
‘If there is effective action, when this individual’s body breaks up, after death, they will be reborn in a good place, a heavenly realm.But let us grant that those who say that there is no effective action are correct.Regardless, that individual is still praised by sensible people in this very life as being a moral individual of right view, who affirms the efficacy of action.’
So if there really is effective action, they hold a winning hand on both counts.
版本与引用信息
母版来自 SuttaCentral / Bilara。本页仅重组显示层;原文、原生次序与 Bilara 段落标识均未改动。权利说明:CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练。
- 目录
- SuttaCentral MN60 · Sujato EN
- 当前阅读页
- A Sure Bet · 1/3
- 显示
- 忠实保留 Sujato 英译·未添加机器译文
研究边界
书目关系边界:Sujato 英译/中部第 60 经(Sujato 英译):Bilara published eac6c24781dd1eefdc17dc2f787b54bf6fe31719 translation/en/sujato 对应已持有巴利作品 gbcr:work:majjhima-nikaya-mn60-pali;挂接既有作品,不新建作品。出版记录 scpub3 为 CC0。
归属边界:Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译;挂接已持有巴利经藏作品,不另建作品,也不把英译等同佛陀逐字亲说。署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral / Bilara published 固定提交。SuttaCentral 数据不得用于生成式模型训练。