The Shorter Advice to Rāhula
当前为 The Shorter Advice to Rāhula · 1/1 阅读页。Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译与 SuttaCentral / Bilara 原生段落标识保持不变;不用于生成式模型训练。
- 本页内容
- 英文译本 · 稳定分页
- 当前阅读页
- The Shorter Advice to Rāhula · 1/1
- 可引用原文
- 110 段
- 全文规模
- 全经 110 稳定段落
- 责任者
- Bhikkhu Sujato
- 正文语种
- 英文
- 权利
- CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练
同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS
同一作品,保留不同表达。
2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。查看全部
同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS
同一作品,保留不同表达。
2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。- 英文当前阅读The Shorter Advice to RāhulaSuttaCentral MN147 · Sujato ENBhikkhu Sujato
- 巴利语(罗马字母)完整原文 · 原生段落CūḷarāhulovādasuttaSuttaCentral MN147Mahāsaṅgīti Tipiṭaka Buddhavasse 2500
阅读目录第 1 阅读页 · The Shorter Advice to Rāhula · 1/1
选一句,查术语、看异译、问含义或带走引用。选中任意经文,系统会按完整稳定行段取文;问经时不会暗中换经。
我的选文Middle Discourses 147The Shorter Advice to Rāhula
So I have heard.At one time the Buddha was staying near Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove, Anāthapiṇḍika’s monastery.Then as he was in private retreat this thought came to his mind,
“The qualities that ripen in freedom have ripened in Rāhula.Why don’t I lead him further to the ending of defilements?”Then the Buddha robed up in the morning and, taking his bowl and robe, entered Sāvatthī for alms.
Then, after the meal, on his return from almsround, he addressed Venerable Rāhula,“Rāhula, get your sitting cloth.Let’s go to the Dark Forest for the day’s meditation.”
“Yes, sir,” replied Rāhula. Taking his sitting cloth he followed behind the Buddha.Now at that time many thousands of deities followed the Buddha, thinking,“Today the Buddha will lead Rāhula further to the ending of defilements!”
Then the Buddha plunged deep into the Dark Forest and sat at the root of a tree on the seat spread out.Rāhula bowed to the Buddha and sat down to one side.The Buddha said to him:
“What do you think, Rāhula?Is the eye permanent or impermanent?”“Impermanent, sir.”
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”“Suffering, sir.”“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus:
‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”“No, sir.”“What do you think, Rāhula?
Are sights permanent or impermanent?”“Impermanent, sir.”“But if they’re impermanent, are they suffering or happiness?”
“Suffering, sir.”“But if they’re impermanent, suffering, and perishable, are they fit to be regarded thus:‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“No, sir.”“What do you think, Rāhula?Is eye consciousness permanent or impermanent?”
“Impermanent, sir.”“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”“Suffering, sir.”
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus:‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”“No, sir.”
“What do you think, Rāhula?Is eye contact permanent or impermanent?”“Impermanent, sir.”
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”“Suffering, sir.”“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus:
‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”“No, sir.”“What do you think, Rāhula?
Anything included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness that arises dependent on eye contact: is that permanent or impermanent?”“Impermanent, sir.”“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”
“Suffering, sir.”“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus:‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“No, sir.”“What do you think, Rāhula? Is the ear …nose …
tongue …body …mind permanent or impermanent?”
“Impermanent, sir.”“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”“Suffering, sir.”
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus:‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”“No, sir.”
“What do you think, Rāhula? Are ideas permanent or impermanent?”“Impermanent, sir.”“But if they’re impermanent, are they suffering or happiness?”
“Suffering, sir.”“But if they’re impermanent, suffering, and perishable, are they fit to be regarded thus:‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”
“No, sir.”“What do you think, Rāhula? Is mind consciousness permanent or impermanent?”“Impermanent, sir.”
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”“Suffering, sir.”“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus:
‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”“No, sir.”“What do you think, Rāhula? Is mind contact permanent or impermanent?”
“Impermanent, sir.”“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”“Suffering, sir.”
“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus:‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”“No, sir.”
“What do you think, Rāhula?Anything included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness that arises dependent on mind contact: is that permanent or impermanent?”“Impermanent, sir.”
“But if it’s impermanent, is it suffering or happiness?”“Suffering, sir.”“But if it’s impermanent, suffering, and perishable, is it fit to be regarded thus:
‘This is mine, I am this, this is my self’?”“No, sir.”“Seeing this, a learned noble disciple grows disillusioned with the eye, sights, eye consciousness, and eye contact. And they grow disillusioned with anything included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness that arises dependent on eye contact.
They grow disillusioned with the ear …nose …tongue …
body …mind, ideas, mind consciousness, and mind contact. And they grow disillusioned with anything included in feeling, perception, choices, and consciousness that arises dependent on mind contact.Being disillusioned, desire fades away. When desire fades away they’re freed. When they’re freed, they know they’re freed.
They understand: ‘Rebirth is ended, the spiritual journey has been completed, what had to be done has been done, there is nothing further for this place.’”That is what the Buddha said.Satisfied, Venerable Rāhula approved what the Buddha said.
And while this discourse was being spoken, Rāhula’s mind was freed from defilements by not grasping.And the stainless, immaculate vision of the Dhamma arose in those thousands of deities:“Everything that is liable to arise is liable to cease.”
版本与引用信息
母版来自 SuttaCentral / Bilara。本页仅重组显示层;原文、原生次序与 Bilara 段落标识均未改动。权利说明:CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练。
- 目录
- SuttaCentral MN147 · Sujato EN
- 当前阅读页
- The Shorter Advice to Rāhula · 1/1
- 显示
- 忠实保留 Sujato 英译·未添加机器译文
研究边界
书目关系边界:Sujato 英译/中部第 147 经(Sujato 英译):Bilara published eac6c24781dd1eefdc17dc2f787b54bf6fe31719 translation/en/sujato 对应已持有巴利作品 gbcr:work:majjhima-nikaya-mn147-pali;挂接既有作品,不新建作品。出版记录 scpub3 为 CC0。
归属边界:Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译;挂接已持有巴利经藏作品,不另建作品,也不把英译等同佛陀逐字亲说。署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral / Bilara published 固定提交。SuttaCentral 数据不得用于生成式模型训练。