With Sunakkhatta
当前为 With Sunakkhatta · 2/2 阅读页。Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译与 SuttaCentral / Bilara 原生段落标识保持不变;不用于生成式模型训练。
- 本页内容
- 英文译本 · 稳定分页
- 当前阅读页
- With Sunakkhatta · 2/2
- 可引用原文
- 60 段
- 全文规模
- 全经 180 稳定段落
- 责任者
- Bhikkhu Sujato
- 正文语种
- 英文
- 权利
- CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练
同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS
同一作品,保留不同表达。
2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。查看全部
同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS
同一作品,保留不同表达。
2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。- 英文当前阅读With SunakkhattaSuttaCentral MN105 · Sujato ENBhikkhu Sujato
- 巴利语(罗马字母)完整原文 · 原生段落SunakkhattasuttaSuttaCentral MN105Mahāsaṅgīti Tipiṭaka Buddhavasse 2500
阅读页目录 · 2 阅读页第 2 阅读页 · With Sunakkhatta · 2/2
选一句,查术语、看异译、问含义或带走引用。选中任意经文,系统会按完整稳定行段取文;问经时不会暗中换经。
我的选文I have given up the dart of craving and expelled the poison of ignorance; I am rightly intent on extinguishment.’Being rightly intent on extinguishment, they wouldn’t engage in things unconducive to extinguishment: unsuitable sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and ideas.Doing so, lust wouldn’t infect their mind,
so no death or deadly pain would result.Suppose a man was struck by an arrow thickly smeared with poison.Their friends and colleagues, relatives and kin would get a surgeon to treat them.
The surgeon would cut open the wound with a scalpel,probe for the arrow,extract it, and expel the poison, leaving no residue behind.
Knowing that no residue remained, the surgeon would say:‘My man, the dart has been extracted and the poison expelled with no residue.It’s not capable of harming you.
Eat only suitable food. Don’t eat unsuitable food, or else the wound may get infected.Regularly wash the wound and anoint the opening, or else it’ll get covered with pus and blood.Don’t walk too much in the wind and sun, or else dust and dirt will infect the wound.
Take care of the wound, my man, heal it.’They’d think:‘The dart has been extracted and the poison expelled with no residue.
It’s not capable of harming me.’They’d eat suitable food, and the wound wouldn’t get infected.And they’d regularly wash and anoint the opening, so it wouldn’t get covered in pus and blood.
And they wouldn’t walk too much in the wind and sun, so dust and dirt wouldn’t infect the wound.And they’d take care of the wound and heal it.Then both because they did what was suitable, and the unclean poison had left no residue, the wound would heal,
and no death or deadly pain would result.In the same way, it’s possible that a certain mendicant might think:‘The Ascetic has said that craving is a dart; and that the poison of ignorance is inflicted by desire and ill will.
I have given up the dart of craving and expelled the poison of ignorance; I am rightly intent on extinguishment.’Being rightly intent on extinguishment, they wouldn’t engage in things unconducive to extinguishment: unsuitable sights, sounds, smells, tastes, touches, and ideas.Doing so, lust wouldn’t infect their mind,
so no death or deadly pain would result.I’ve made up this simile to make a point.And this is the point:
‘Wound’ is a term for the six interior sense fields.‘Poison’ is a term for ignorance.‘Dart’ is a term for craving.
‘Probing’ is a term for mindfulness.‘Scalpel’ is a term for noble wisdom.‘Surgeon’ is a term for the Realized One, the perfected one, the fully awakened Buddha.
Truly, Sunakkhatta, that mendicant practices restraint regarding the six fields of contact.Understanding that attachment is the root of suffering, they are freed with the ending of attachments. It’s not possible that they would apply their body or interest their mind in any attachment.Suppose there was a bronze goblet of beverage that had a nice color, aroma, and flavor.
But it was mixed with poison.Then a person would come along who wants to live and doesn’t want to die, who wants to be happy and recoils from pain.What do you think, Sunakkhatta?
Would that person drink that beverage if they knew thatit would result in death or deadly suffering?”“No, sir.”
“In the same way, Sunakkhatta, that mendicant practices restraint regarding the six fields of contact.Understanding that attachment is the root of suffering, they are freed with the ending of attachments. It’s not possible that they would apply their body or interest their mind in any attachment.Suppose there was a lethal viper.
Then a person would come along who wants to live and doesn’t want to die, who wants to be happy and recoils from pain.What do you think, Sunakkhatta?Would that person give that lethal viper their hand or finger if they knew that
it would result in death or deadly suffering?”“No, sir.”“In the same way, Sunakkhatta, that mendicant practices restraint regarding the six fields of contact.
Understanding that attachment is the root of suffering, they are freed with the ending of attachments. It’s not possible that they would apply their body or interest their mind in any attachment.”That is what the Buddha said.Satisfied, Sunakkhatta of the Licchavi clan approved what the Buddha said.
版本与引用信息
母版来自 SuttaCentral / Bilara。本页仅重组显示层;原文、原生次序与 Bilara 段落标识均未改动。权利说明:CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练。
- 目录
- SuttaCentral MN105 · Sujato EN
- 当前阅读页
- With Sunakkhatta · 2/2
- 显示
- 忠实保留 Sujato 英译·未添加机器译文
研究边界
书目关系边界:Sujato 英译/中部第 105 经(Sujato 英译):Bilara published eac6c24781dd1eefdc17dc2f787b54bf6fe31719 translation/en/sujato 对应已持有巴利作品 gbcr:work:majjhima-nikaya-mn105-pali;挂接既有作品,不新建作品。出版记录 scpub3 为 CC0。
归属边界:Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译;挂接已持有巴利经藏作品,不另建作品,也不把英译等同佛陀逐字亲说。署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral / Bilara published 固定提交。SuttaCentral 数据不得用于生成式模型训练。