上座部佛教

中部第 101 经(Sujato 英译)第 1 阅读页 · At Devadaha · 1/3

At Devadaha · Bhikkhu Sujato

完整原文 · 英文译本SuttaCentral MN101 · Sujato EN
返回文本目录:《At Devadaha》
中部第 101 经(Sujato 英译)英文译本完整英文译本 · 稳定分页

At Devadaha

当前为 At Devadaha · 1/3 阅读页。Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译与 SuttaCentral / Bilara 原生段落标识保持不变;不用于生成式模型训练。

本页内容
英文译本 · 稳定分页
当前阅读页
At Devadaha · 1/3
可引用原文
120
全文规模
全经 290 稳定段落
责任者
Bhikkhu Sujato
正文语种
英文
权利
CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练

同一作品 · TEXTUAL EXPRESSIONS

同一作品,保留不同表达。

2 种可读文本表达 · 2 种语文。异译、节本、版本与数字见证各自保留; 共享作品标识不等于逐句相同,也不表示已经逐段对齐。
查看全部
稳定作品标识gbcr:work:majjhima-nikaya-mn101-pali
阅读页目录 · 3 阅读页第 1 阅读页 · At Devadaha · 1/3
阅读设置设置会在阅读页间保留

忠实保留 Sujato 英译。Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译、Bilara 原生段落标识与 SuttaCentral 来源署名保持不变;不用于生成式模型训练。

选一句,查术语、看异译、问含义或带走引用。选中任意经文,系统会按完整稳定行段取文;问经时不会暗中换经。

我的选文

Middle Discourses 101At Devadaha

So I have heard.At one time the Buddha was staying in the land of the Sakyans, near the Sakyan town named Devadaha.There the Buddha addressed the mendicants,

“Mendicants!”“Venerable sir,” they replied.The Buddha said this:

“Mendicants, there are some ascetics and brahmins who have this doctrine and view:‘Everything this individual person experiences—pleasurable, painful, or neutral—is because of past deeds.So, due to eliminating past deeds by fervent mortification, and not doing any new deeds, there’s nothing to come up in the future.

With no future consequence, deeds end. With the ending of deeds, suffering ends. With the ending of suffering, feeling ends. And with the ending of feeling, all suffering will have been worn away.’Such is the doctrine of the Jain ascetics.I’ve gone up to the Jain ascetics who say this and said,

‘Is it really true that this is the venerables’ view?’They admitted that it is.I said to them,

‘But reverends, do you knowfor sure that you existed in the past, and it is not the case that you did not exist?’‘No we don’t, reverend.’

‘But reverends, do you knowfor sure that you did bad deeds in the past?’‘No we don’t, reverend.’

‘But reverends, do you knowthat you did bad deeds of this type or that?’‘No we don’t, reverend.’

‘But reverends, do you knowthat so much suffering has already been worn away? Or that so much suffering still remains to be worn away? Or that when so much suffering is worn away all suffering will have been worn away?’‘No we don’t, reverend.’

‘But reverends, do you knowabout giving up unskillful qualities in this very life and embracing skillful qualities?’‘No we don’t, reverend.’

‘So it seems that you don’t know any of these things.In that case, it’s not appropriate for the Jain venerables to declare this.Now, supposing you did know these things.

In that case, it would be appropriate for the Jain venerables to declare this.Suppose a man was struck by an arrow thickly smeared with poison,causing painful feelings, sharp and severe.

Their friends and colleagues, relatives and kin would get a surgeon to treat them.The surgeon would cut open the wound with a scalpel,causing painful feelings, sharp and severe.

They’d probe for the arrow,causing painful feelings, sharp and severe.They’d extract the arrow,

causing painful feelings, sharp and severe.They’d apply cauterizing medicine to the wound,causing painful feelings, sharp and severe.

After some time that wound would be healed and the skin regrown. They’d be healthy, happy, autonomous, master of themselves, able to go where they wanted.They’d think,“Earlier I was struck by an arrow thickly smeared with poison,

causing painful feelings, sharp and severe.My friends and colleagues, relatives and kin got a surgeon to treat me.At each step, the treatment was painful.

But these days that wound is healed and the skin regrown. I’m healthy, happy, autonomous, my own master, able to go where I want.”In the same way, reverends, if you knew about these things,it would be appropriate for the Jain venerables to declare this.

But since you don’t know any of these things,it’s not appropriate for the Jain venerables to declare this.’When I said this, those Jain ascetics said to me,

‘Reverend, the Jain ascetic of the Ñātika clan claims to be all-knowing and all-seeing, to know and see everything without exception, thus:“Knowledge and vision are constantly and continually present to me, while walking, standing, sleeping, and waking.”He says:

“O reverend Jain ascetics, you have done bad deeds in a past life. Wear them away with these severe and grueling austerities.And when in the present you are restrained in body, speech, and mind, you’re not doing any bad deeds for the future.So, due to eliminating past deeds by fervent mortification, and not doing any new deeds, there’s nothing to come up in the future.

With no future consequence, deeds end. With the ending of deeds, suffering ends. With the ending of suffering, feeling ends. And with the ending of feeling, all suffering will have been worn away.”We endorse and accept this, and we are satisfied with it.’When they said this, I said to them,

‘These five things can be seen to turn out in two different ways in this very life.What five?Faith, endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, and acceptance of a view after deliberation.

These are the five things that can be seen to turn out in two different ways in this very life.In this case, what faith in your teacher do you have when it comes to the past? What endorsement, oral transmission, reasoned train of thought, or acceptance of a view after deliberation?’When I said this, I did not see any legitimate defense of their doctrine from the Jains.

Furthermore, I said to those Jain ascetics,‘What do you think, reverends?At a time of intense exertion and striving do you suffer painful, sharp, severe, acute feelings due to exertion?

Whereas at a time without intense exertion and striving do you not suffer painful, sharp, severe, acute feelings due to exertion?’‘Reverend Gotama, at a time of intense exertion we suffer painful, sharp feelings due to exertion,not without intense exertion.’

‘So it seems that only at a time of intense exertion do you suffer painful, sharp feelings due to exertion,not without intense exertion.In that case, it’s not appropriate for the Jain venerables to declare:

“Everything this individual person experiences—pleasurable, painful, or neutral—is because of past deeds. …”If at a time of intense exertion you did not suffer painful, sharp feelings due to exertion,and if without intense exertion you did experience such feelings,

it would be appropriate for the Jain venerables to declare this.But since this is not the case,aren’t you experiencing painful, sharp feelings due only to your own exertion, which out of ignorance, unknowing, and confusion you misconstrue to imply:

“Everything this individual person experiences—pleasurable, painful, or neutral—is because of past deeds. …”?’When I said this, I did not see any legitimate defense of their doctrine from the Jains.Furthermore, I said to those Jain ascetics,

‘What do you think, reverends? If a deed is to be experienced in this life, can exertion make it be experienced in lives to come?’‘No, reverend.’‘But if a deed is to be experienced in lives to come, can exertion make it be experienced in this life?’

‘No, reverend.’‘What do you think, reverends? If a deed is to be experienced as pleasant, can exertion make it be experienced as painful?’‘No, reverend.’

‘But if a deed is to be experienced as painful, can exertion make it be experienced as pleasant?’‘No, reverend.’‘What do you think, reverends? If a deed is to be experienced when ripe, can exertion make it be experienced when unripe?’

‘No, reverend.’‘But if a deed is to be experienced when unripe, can exertion make it be experienced when ripe?’‘No, reverend.’

‘What do you think, reverends? If a deed is to be experienced a lot, can exertion make it be experienced a little?’‘No, reverend.’‘But if a deed is to be experienced a little, can exertion make it be experienced a lot?’

‘No, reverend.’‘What do you think, reverends? If a deed is to be experienced, can exertion make it not be experienced?’‘No, reverend.’

‘But if a deed is not to be experienced, can exertion make it be experienced?’‘No, reverend.’‘So it seems that exertion cannot change the way deeds are experienced in any of these ways.

This being so, your exertion and striving are fruitless.’Such is the doctrine of the Jain ascetics.Saying this, the Jain ascetics deserve rebuttal and criticism on ten legitimate grounds.

If sentient beings experience pleasure and pain because of past deeds,clearly the Jains have done bad deeds in the past, since they now experience such intense pain.If sentient beings experience pleasure and pain because of God Almighty’s creation,

clearly the Jains were created by a bad God, since they now experience such intense pain.

版本与引用信息

母版来自 SuttaCentral / Bilara本页仅重组显示层;原文、原生次序与 Bilara 段落标识均未改动。权利说明:CC0 1.0;署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral;禁止用于生成式模型训练

目录
SuttaCentral MN101 · Sujato EN
当前阅读页
At Devadaha · 1/3
显示
忠实保留 Sujato 英译·未添加机器译文

研究边界

书目关系边界:Sujato 英译/中部第 101 经(Sujato 英译):Bilara published eac6c24781dd1eefdc17dc2f787b54bf6fe31719 translation/en/sujato 对应已持有巴利作品 gbcr:work:majjhima-nikaya-mn101-pali;挂接既有作品,不新建作品。出版记录 scpub3 为 CC0。

归属边界:Bhikkhu Sujato CC0 英译;挂接已持有巴利经藏作品,不另建作品,也不把英译等同佛陀逐字亲说。署名 Bhikkhu Sujato 与 SuttaCentral / Bilara published 固定提交。SuttaCentral 数据不得用于生成式模型训练。